Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid controller

Sekcia: Hardware a Drivery 16.01.2006 | 19:41
lacod   Návštevník
Zdravim, mate niekto skusenosti s kontrolerom Intel SRCS16 SATA RAID? Jedna sa mi hlavne o benchmarky pri konfiguracii s RAID 5 a 4x400GB. Pouzity driver je megaraid2. (Radic obsahuje LSI MegaRAID chipset.)
    • Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid controller 10.01.2006 | 12:09
      Avatar marcell.glx Fedora Core 4  Používateľ
      Nazdar lacod ! Ja mam zase radic Intel SRCS28X a Fedora 4 mi automaticky nastavila ovladace megaraid2. Takisto tam ma RAID 5 a zapis je dost pomali, citanie je rychlejsie ale tiez to nie je bohvieco. Takisto mam integrovany radic na MB: lspci: 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 Family) IDE Controller (rev 03) 00:1f.2 Class 0106: Intel Corporation 82801FR/FRW (ICH6R/ICH6RW) SATA Controller (rev 03) lsmod | grep ata ata_piix 9541 4 libata 47437 1 ata_piix scsi_mod 135785 3 megaraid_mbox,libata,sd_mod A disky na tom integrovanom radici mi idu strasne pomali (DMA vyzera byt pritom zapnute, lebo zatazenie procesora je male, len sa vzdy dlho caka na disky). Neda sa SATA nejako nastavit/tuningovat vo Fedora 4 ? Ako si mozeme porovnat vykonnost radicov ?
      • Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid controller 10.01.2006 | 21:31
        WlaSaTy   Návštevník
        nazdar marcell.glx ! vo vseobecnosti je zapis na raid5 pomalsi ako na raid1 koli tomu ze pri zapise na 5ku sa vypocitavaju CRC (je jedno ci na CPU alebo na radici) kdezto pri jednotke sa iba zrkadli tok dat na dva a viac diskov. ake mas parametre citania disku? PS.: keby si chcel vyladit vykon diskov tak aby ti ostala redundancia, tak mozes pouzit raid0+1 alebo raid1+0. mimochodom, zaujimalo by ma ci ma niekto realne skusenosti s raid2 na hdd a ci to ma nejaky vyznam.
        • Re: Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid controller 13.01.2006 | 16:54
          marcell.glx   Návštevník
          Je mi jasne ze zapis na RAID5 je pomalsi, ale aj tak mam pocit, ze v mojom pripade je to trocha viac. Len si to nemam s cim porovnat. Akym programom mam zistit "parametre citania disku" ? Okrem toho, na tom istom pocitaci mam aj 2x SATA disky, ktore nie su v ziadnom RAID a idu naozaj velmi pomali. Mozem o tom napisat aj viac, pretoze naozaj netusim preco su take pomale (ovladace by mali byt sprave a DMA vyzera byt zapnute). A naozaj velmi rad by som ich problem s ich pomalostou vyriesil, len netusim ako. Pisal som o tom aj do fora : sata-dma.... Dik za odpoved.
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid controller 13.01.2006 | 18:07
            WlaSaTy   Návštevník
            akym programom mam zistit parametre citania disku? hdparm -tT /dev/sd? popripade /dev/md? ci kde mas ten raid. ak to mas pomale, tak to moze byt sposobene aj pretazenim PCI zbernice.
            • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid control 16.01.2006 | 15:01
              Avatar marcell.glx Fedora Core 4  Používateľ
              /dev/sda + /dev/sdb NON-RAID SATA HD: Maxtor 6L080M0 Radic: Onboard Intel 82801FR/FRW (ICH6R/ICH6RW) SATA Controller (rev 03) /dev/sdc RAID-5 SATA HD: WD Caviar SATA WD2500SD-01KCC0 Radic: Intel SRCS28X hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3532 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1765.89 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 118 MB in 3.00 seconds = 39.28 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 3756 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1877.88 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 136 MB in 3.01 seconds = 45.21 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device /dev/sdc: Timing cached reads: 3680 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1839.89 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 90 MB in 3.10 seconds = 28.99 MB/sec hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3632 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1815.89 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 94 MB in 3.24 seconds = 29.01 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 3608 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1803.89 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 96 MB in 3.82 seconds = 25.13 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device /dev/sdc: Timing cached reads: 3676 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1837.89 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 102 MB in 3.44 seconds = 29.61 MB/sec hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 3628 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1813.89 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 106 MB in 3.62 seconds = 29.28 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 3752 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1875.88 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device Timing buffered disk reads: 188 MB in 3.03 seconds = 62.00 MB/sec HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(null) (wait for flush complete) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device /dev/sdc: Timing cached reads: 3532 MB in 2.00 seconds = 1765.89 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 316 MB in 3.08 seconds = 102.72 MB/sec
              • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid con 16.01.2006 | 15:21
                Avatar marcell.glx Fedora Core 4  Používateľ
                Nie som si ale uplne isty ci zrovna hdparm dokaze poskytnut nejake smerodajne udaje o vykonosti. V pocitaci je iba jedna dodatocna PCI karta a to je ten RAID radic, tak neviem ci je pretazena PCI zbernica - ako to zistim ?
                • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid 16.01.2006 | 19:39
                  WlaSaTy   Návštevník
                  hdparm dokaze podat dostatocne informacie pre test rychlosti citania a zapisu na disky. ako som pochopil, tak sda+sdb su spojene v raide a preto su pomalsie. ale zeby az o polovicu oproti sdc kory nie je napojeny na raid? to je moc. nejedna sa o rozdielne modely diskov s rozdielnou rychlostou?
              • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Intel SRCS16 SATA Raid con 16.01.2006 | 19:41
                Avatar Tomáš Srnka Barz čo, už asi všetko  Administrátor
                doporucujem precitat: Linux Kernel Archivel.
                Dlho som robil linuxos.sk, neskôr založil vpsFree.cz, posledných pár rokov ako tech. riaditeľ vo Websupporte